Elo v. State

MANFORD, Presiding Judge.

This appeal follows a denial of post conviction relief, pursuant to a Rule 27.26 motion. The judgment is affirmed.

*645Movant presents four points charging the judgment of the trial court was clearly erroneous because (1) the trial court made a finding that no testimony was received about statements made by movant when, in fact, the evidence revealed the contrary, (2) movant’s statements were involuntary and made without proper waiver of the Miranda rights, (3) movant’s statements and the recovered handgun and money were obtained as fruit of the poisonous tree and…