Legal Opinion
United States v. Gerardo Herrera-Gonzalez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2001No. 99-10504PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
This is a drug conspiracy case in which the main issue is sufficiency of evidence of participation in the conspiracy.
I. FACTS
This case was tried and the jury convicted. We therefore report the facts based on the evidence introduced at trial.
Herrera-Gonzalez was apprehended at a ranch where methamphetamine was being manufactured. The evidence established overwhelmingly that several people were acting together to manufacture large quantities of methamphetamine. But he testified that he did not know about the methamphetamine and that he did not help in its manufacture.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Gregory LennickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gregorio De Jesus Mares, United States of America v. Alfredo Martinez-OsunaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. PerlazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Corona-VerberaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.