Legal Opinion

State v. Baum

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 7, 1956No. 42778PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Our decision in this lottery case is controlled by the opinions we handed down recently in State v. Forsyth, 229 La. 690, 86 So.2d 530; State v. Reinhardt, 229 La., 673, 86 So.2d 530; State v. Mills, 229 La. 758, 86 So.2d 895; State v. Callia, 229 La. 796, 86 So.2d 909; State v. Crovetto, 229 La. 793, 86 So.2d 907; and State v. Forsyth, 229 La. 1088, 87 So.2d 608. Christian *249W. Baum, Sr., Frank Schnell, and Lionel Barthelemy, Sr., are here submitting to us without oral argument their appeal from convictions of gambling as prohibited by Article 90 of the Louisiana Criminal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MillsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. State v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. State v. CrovettoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. State v. CalliaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. State v. ForsythSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API