Legal Opinion

Palazzo v. Bunag

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 10, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, without costs, so much of the complaint as was asserted against defendant Maria Bu-nag is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial limited to the issue of damages on that portion of the complaint.

Plaintiff Gary Palazzo commenced this action in Supreme Court, Richmond County, to recover for injuries he had sustained as a result of falling on a sidewalk abutting residential property owned by defendant Maria Bunag. His wife, plaintiff Carol Palazzo, sued derivatively. Following discovery, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vucetovic v. Epsom DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. James v. BlackmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Gyokchyan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Litkenhaus v. 1158 Hylan Boulevard Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API