Legal Opinion
Shipley v. Cates
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided August 8, 2006No. SC 87063Published
1Opinion of the Court
200 S.W.3d 529 (2006)
Daniel R. SHIPLEY, Respondent,
v.
Ronald CATES, et al., Appellants.
No. SC 87063.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
August 8, 2006.
Rehearing Denied September 26, 2006.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joel E. Anderson, Rikki L. Wright, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, Roger K. Evans, New York, NY, Arthur A. Benson, II, Jamie K. Lansford, Kansas City, for appellants.
Robert D. Nienhuis, St. Louis, John D. Landwehr, Jefferson City, for respondent.
MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Chief Justice.
History of the Controversy
This is the latest and, perhaps, the last battle over whether Planned…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Bride v. City of SlaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. O'malley.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Sparks v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.