Davis v. Davis
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Dissent
HORNBECK, J„
dissenting:
I dissent from the judgment of reversal and disagree with the conclusions drawn by Judge Barnes to support his opinion respecting the assigned errors.
In fairness to the parties, their counsel and, especially the trial judge, who may have to try this case again and is entitled to our view of the law because of the difficult questions presented, and as it is our obligation to pass on each error assigned, §12248 GC, I shall express my opinion on all of them.
THE ISSUES.
The basic questions on this appeal relate to the issues and the effect of the Reno divorce decree.
It is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Warren v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Renner v. RennerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Sprung v. E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
- Grein v. GreinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.