City and County of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Doyle
I respectfully dissent from the decision and reasoning expressed in the majority opinion. My objections fall into two classes and I shall preface my specific objections with some general observations.
First, the opinion seems unlimited in its sweeping terms. It expresses a philosophical aversion to all zoning efforts. The decision itself is limited to a holding that the off-street parking and non-conforming use provisions *166of the zoning ordinance are invalid. Its expressions of viewpoint are at variance with the basic premise that a city can be planned and that restrictions for the general good…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- McSorley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.