Legal Opinion
Arnav Industries, Inc. v. Pitari
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s second defense and first counterclaim alleges that plaintiff is barred by Multiple Dwelling Law § 302 from collecting the rent defendant has withheld because the building has no certificate of occupancy and her apartment has no second means of fire egress. Plaintiff established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on the Multiple Dwelling Law § 302 defense. In an affidavit in support of the motion, plaintiffs architect stated that no new permanent certificate of occupancy had been issued because the Department of Buildings will not issue a new permanent certificate of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Park West Management Corp. v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
- Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dee Cee Associates LLC v. 44 Beehan Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- K-Bay Plaza, LLC v. Kmart Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- 24th Street Holding LLC v. MartinezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013