Legal Opinion

Syth v. Parke

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1991No. 18437, 19367Published

1Opinion of the Court

823 P.2d 766 (1991)

121 Idaho 162

Thomas W. SYTH and Cindy Syth, husband and wife, plaintiffs-respondents,

v.

David L. PARKE, D.C., and B.C. Rene Parke, husband and wife, dba Pend Oreille Chiropractic Center, defendants-appellants.

Thomas W. SYTH and Cindy Syth, husband and wife, plaintiffs-appellants,

v.

David L. PARKE, D.C., and B.C. Rene Parke, husband and wife; David D. Cox and Patricia B. Cox, husband and wife, dba Pend Oreille Chiropractic Center, defendants-respondents.

Nos. 18437, 19367.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur d'Alene Term, October 1991.

December 20, 1991.

Cosho, Humphrey, Greener &…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Obray v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. H & v Engineering, Inc. v. Idaho State Board of Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. First Security Bank of Idaho National Ass'n v. NeibaurIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API