Stevens v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
DONOFRIO, Judge.
This is another heart case, involving a myocardial infarction. It is the opinion of the Court that a detailed repetition of the facts is not necessary, for the fact situation is unique to this case, and the question before the Court is whether or not the award of the Industrial Commission is reasonably supported by the evidence.
When the results of an industrial accident cannot clearly be seen by laymen, such as the loss of an arm or a leg, the question of physical disability or impairment can be resolved only through the use of expert medical testimony. Bedel v. Industrial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bedel v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Linn v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Fyffe v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Parkway Manufacturing v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Reynolds Metal Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974