Legal Opinion
State v. Alphonse
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 22, 1923No. 26139PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.
Appellant was convicted and sentenced for a violation of Act 209 of 19Í4.
Five exceptions were noted and bills reserved to rulings of the court excluding testimony offered for the purpose of negativing fraudulent intent. All of the bills present the same question for review.
The pertinent part of the statute is as follows :
“Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Louisiana, that any person who, with intent to defraud, shall obtain money, credit, goods, wares, or anything of value by means of the making or drawing or uttering or delivering of any check, draft or order for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ogletree v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- People v. SweeneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Coleman v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- State v. HollywaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. McLeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Pueblo v. Cuevas CollazoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
- State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Davis-Delcambre Motors, Inc. v. SimonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- People v. Cuevas CollazoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939