Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 27, 2007PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Andrias, J.P.

In these appeals arising from a Surrogate’s Court proceeding to determine what legal fees are due to the law firm of Graubard Miller for its representation of Alice Lawrence and her son Richard Lawrence in connection with the estate of her late husband, the principal issue presented is whether a 2005 revised retainer agreement calling for Mrs. Lawrence to pay a contingency fee of 40% of any future monies distributed to the beneficiaries of the estate is unconscionable on its face. We find that, *4while at first blush such agreement might arguably seem excessive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. King v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Birnbaum v. Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Rosenman & Colin v. WinstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Estate of Grimm v. EvansColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. New York State Thruway Authority v. Level 3 Communications, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  4. Gendot Associates v. KaufoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Lawrence v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API