Legal Opinion

Pairque v. Ortolano

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1916No. 6508Published

Appeal from the 28th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, No. 1736. Honorable P. E. Edrington, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

His Honor, 'CHARLES F, CLAIBORNE,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

•This is a redhibitory action. The plaintiff alleges that on April Tlth, 1914, he purchased of the defendant a horse; that on April 20th, 1914, after the sale, it took sud-. *166dexily sick and died of heart failure within twenty min'utes; that said disease existed before the sale, wherefore he claims a return of the price.

Defendant admits the sale, but denies all the other allegations and specially avers that the horse was sound when sold and that if he died of any disease it developed after the sale.

There…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neslie v. Second & Third Streets Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Wright v. North School DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  3. Heydt v. FreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API