Legal Opinion

Binsau v. Garstin

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 15, 1962No. 35PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

This is an action by a servant against his employers for damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall from a roof on which he was working. Two charges of negligence are alleged: (1) that defendants failed to provide plaintiff with safe tools and equipment and a safe place to work; and (2) that defendants failed to warn plaintiff of the slippery condition of the roof where he was sent to work and from which he fell. At the conclusion of all the testimony the trial court held that there was no evidence of any negligence of the de*425fendants causing the accident, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Sawyer v. Rumford Falls Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
  3. Louft v. C. & J. Pyle Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
  4. Thouron v. AcreeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Jemnienski v. Lobdell Car Wheel Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DiOssi v. MaroneySupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Mujahid v. Iron Hill ApartmentsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API