Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Phyle v. Duffy

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1949No. S. F. 17855Published

1ConcurrenceTraynor, J.

I concur in the judgment.

Petitioner contends that under the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Phyle v. Duffy, 334 U.S. 431 [68 S.Ct. 1131, 92 L.Ed. 1494], he is entitled to the judicial hearing that this court has denied him.

Neither that decision nor any provision of the United States Constitution gives petitioner the right to an initial judicial determination of his restoration to sanity or to a judicial review of an administrative determination thereof. The statutes of this state, as construed in In re Phyle, 30 Cal.2d 838 [186 P.2d 134], preclude both a judicial hearing and…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API