Pyles v. Portland Gold Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Allen
This is an action in replevin. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has sued out this writ and applies for a supersedeas.
There is no dispute as to such facts which it is necessary to consider. Plaintiff sues as the administrator of a decedent who owned a lot and improvements thereon in the city of Victor. The 1919 taxes were not paid and the property was sold to Teller county. The 1920, 1921 and 1922 taxes were not paid, and were endorsed on the certificate of purchase. On June 19, 1923 the county assigned the certificate to one W. S. Rogers. Shortly thereafter Rogers commenced to wreck a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Howze v. Rook Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meyer v. HaskettColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Bolser v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF GILPINColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bolser v. Board of CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2004