Schultz v. King
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, C.J.:
The district court, after sustaining defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s lien foreclosure complaint and giving plaintiff 10 days to amend, signed and filed a judgment of dismissal after plaintiff had failed to amend within the time allowed. Thereafter, on motion of plaintiff, the court set aside the judgment of dismissal and granted plaintiff 10 days to file an amended complaint. This appeal is from such order.
Appellants assign four errors. The assignments are overlapping and we restate them as follows: (1) That the order complained of was an abuse of the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Esden v. MayNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Golden Belt Lumber Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Stretch v. Montezuma Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1906
- Nevada Consolidated Mining & Milling Co. v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- I. Cox Construction Co. v. CH2 Investments, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Cicerchia v. CicerchiaNevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Byrd Underground, L.L.C. v. Angaur, L.L.C.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014