National Binding Mach. Co. v. Eisler
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suits by the National Binding Machine Company against Anthony Eisler, William M. Lambert, and Junius Nagel, comprising the firm of Anthony Eisler & Co., against W. J. Anderson & Co., and against the Reliable Gummed Tape Company. On final hearing. Actions on rpaterit of Robert H. Piper, No. 700.816, being the same patent involved in National Binding Machine Co. v. McLaurin Co. (C. C.) 186 Fed. 992.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
No exposition of the operation of complainant’s machine or of the relation between the patent claims and the machine itself is necessary. That has been given recently and with sufficient fullness by Hand, J., in the McLaurin Case, supra Instead of testing the stability of that decision by an appeal, the present action has been brought on with the evidence on both sides very considerably amplified.
The position of the defendants on these records is best shown by a remark of their expert (Prof. Main), who was asked whether he had read JudgbHand’s opinion in the McLaurin…
2Cited by2 opinions
- National Binding Mach. Co. v. Harper Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- National Binding Mach. Co. v. Larkin Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916