Eidinger v. Mamlock
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This is a will contest based upon the sole ground of undue influence. At the close of contestant’s case, the trial court was of the opinion that the evidence introduced was wholly insufficient to prove any of the allegations of the petition, and consequently entered a judgment of dismissal, from which the contestant has appealed.
The respondent has not seen fit to appear in this court or give us the benefit of any brief or argument in support of the judgment appealed from.
Three errors are assigned, and we shall treat them in inverse order.
First, that the trial court erred in sustaining…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Estate of TresidderWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Patterson v. McWhirkWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- In re the Estate of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dean v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Estill v. Sisters of CharityWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re the Estate of MartinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Estate of Wind v. WindWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re Larsen's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.