Legal Opinion

Bryce v. SP Plus Corporation

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 18, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01157Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division ) NANCY BRYCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-01157 ) SP PLUS CORPORATION d/b/a SP+ ) Airport Services, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendant SP Plus’ (“SP+” or “Defendant”) Motion to Compel Arbitration (“Motion”) (Dkt. 22). The Court has dispensed with oral argument as it would not aid in the decisional process. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Local Civil Rule 7(J). This matter has been fully briefed and is now ripe for disposition.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API