Legal Opinion

Ratcliff v. Brandt Glass, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1993No. 92-CA-1639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Judge.

This is a worker’s compensation case wherein defendants, Brandt Glass, Inc. and Zurich Insurance Company appeal the judgment of the trial court ordering the defendants to pay for diagnostic tests and treatment of his treating physician, Dr. John Watermeier.

FACTS

On June 15, 1988 plaintiff, Ty Ratcliff filed a petition seeking worker’s compensa*502tion benefits from his employer, Brandt Glass, Inc. and its insurer, Zurich Insurance Company. Plaintiff alleged that he injured his back while uncrating a truckload of glass on November 3, 1987 and that the defendants had paid weekly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. St. Charles General Hosp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Stelly v. United Parcel ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Whittington v. Rimcor, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Dumas v. Hartford Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. LeDoux v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. Langston Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Fenyes v. Highland Park Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Dixon v. BW Farrell, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API