Mobley M. Milam v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Before KILKENNY and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and CRAIG, * District Judge.
Appellant has filed a substantial brief and an adequate reply brief and has argued his full share of allotted time in support for a demand that his $50.00 Federal Reserve Bank Note be redeemed in “lawful money” of the United States, which he says, in effect, must be gold or silver. Appellant refused appellees’ tender of an equivalent value in Federal Reserve Notes.
Appellant’s contentions, in our view, were put at rest close to a century ago in Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421, 448, 4 S.Ct. 122, 130, 28 L.Ed.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Lowell G. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. John Noehl SchmitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. W. Vaughn EllsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. William Marcus GardinerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Herald v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.