Legal Opinion

Mobley M. Milam v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1974No. 72-1666PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Before KILKENNY and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and CRAIG, * District Judge.

Appellant has filed a substantial brief and an adequate reply brief and has argued his full share of allotted time in support for a demand that his $50.00 Federal Reserve Bank Note be redeemed in “lawful money” of the United States, which he says, in effect, must be gold or silver. Appellant refused appellees’ tender of an equivalent value in Federal Reserve Notes.

Appellant’s contentions, in our view, were put at rest close to a century ago in Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421, 448, 4 S.Ct. 122, 130, 28 L.Ed.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Lowell G. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. John Noehl SchmitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. W. Vaughn EllsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. William Marcus GardinerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Herald v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API