Legal Opinion

State v. Teel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 9, 1974No. 737SC807PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant assigns as error that the trial judge coerced the jury into finding defendant guilty of larceny.

The record discloses that the jury deliberated from 4:35 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. on one afternoon and from 9:05 a.m. until 10:10 a.m. the next morning. The jury came into open court and its foreman announced that it had agreed upon a verdict as to one count in the indictment but stood eleven to one as to the other count. The trial judge instructed the jury as follows:

“Members of the Jury, the Court gives you the following instructions. Listen very carefully to what I have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Hayden Louis Harris, Thomas Benton HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. HollowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  2. State v. KeeterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. CurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. CurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API