Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Otasco, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 19, 1980No. 79-243PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

Appellee secured a default judgment on contract against the appellant, who was a resident head of a family, and caused a writ of garnishment to be issued directed to appellant’s employer. The garnishee duly responded that certain wages were being held pending further orders of the court. Appellant filed a schedule and claimed his total wages in the amount of $293.13 as exempt and also the balance of the $500 exemption as head of a household was selected from personal property owned by him. The court held appellant could not schedule any of his wages as part of the $500…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blass v. ErberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  2. Andrews v. BriggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Pemberton v. Bank of Eastern ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Williams v. SwannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re HoltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1988
  2. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Holt (In Re Holt)District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API