Legal Opinion

Pintenics v. Menwig

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 9, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

Plaintiff, administrator of the estate of Julia Pintenies, deceased, instituted a replevin suit against the defendants for the return of a piano, after demand had been made and the return thereof refused. Plaintiff also sought $500 for the piano and its detention. The latter phase of plaintiff’s action (claim for damages) appears to have been abandoned. It is not treated by either party.

The record submitted is meager and unsatisfactory. In the agreed state oí facts it appears that the plaintiff offered, in evidence his letters of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booth v. KeeganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  2. Ciccone v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Security Credit Corp. v. Whiting Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  4. Merchants' Securities Corp. v. LaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zig Zag Spring Co. v. Comfort Spring CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
  2. Grimbalis v. StellingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API