Legal Opinion

Arkansas Teachers Retirement System v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 12, 2018No. 16-250PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wesley, Circuit Judge:

Investors in a securities fraud class action traditionally have a problem proving that “questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over ... questions affecting only individual members” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). The presumption established in Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 108 S.Ct. 978, 99 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988), addressed that problem by allowing courts to presume that the price of stock traded in an efficient market reflects all public, material information—including misrepresentations—and that investors rely on the integrity…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Allstate CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Ark. Tchr. Ret. Sys. v. Goldman Sachs Grp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  4. City of Cape Coral Mun. Firefighters' Ret. Plan v. Emergent Biosolutions, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  5. In Re Shanda Games Ltd. SEC. Litig.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API