People v. Waldorf-Astoria Hotel Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by ti'^ defendant, the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York, upon the decision of the court rendered after, a trial at the New York Trial Term without a jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The question here presented arises under section 31 of the Forest, Fish and Game La,w ' (Laws of 1900, chap. 20 as amd. by Laws of 1904, chap:- 582).
The conceded facts upon which this case was tried are that certain English pheasants were possessed hy the defendant on the dates alleged in the complaint for sale; that these English pheasants were bred and killed in the State of Hew Jersey and purchased by the' defendant in that State. The trial court held as a conclusion of law that the possession of these pheasants was a violation of section SÍ of the Forest, Fish and Game Law.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . Buffalo Fish Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- People v. . BootmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- People Ex Rel. Hill v. . HesterbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Dieterich v. FargoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907