Legal Opinion
Bolden v. Bolden
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1977No. 10773PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Chief Judge:
Adjudicated in civil contempt of court for failure to comply with the real estate disposition provisions of a divorce decree, appellant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in finding her conduct to be contemptuous. We affirm.
The protracted nature of these actions in the trial court and the nature thereof necessitate a detailed recitation of the facts.
These proceedings commenced when appellant filed a petition for support in January 1973. The litigation disclosed the break-up of a marriage which had existed since 1945. An Order of Support was entered on March 26,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and H. E. Gilbert v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hackes v. HackesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Matter of GorfkleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Kammerman v. KammermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Zapata v. ZapataDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.