Legal Opinion

Dantzig v. Universal Carloading & Distributing Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 2, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Charles S. Whitman, Jr., J.

The plaintiff shipped by freight, a carton containing 32 dozen pairs of earrings of a wholesale value of $285, and 4 dozen pairs of cufflinks of a wholesale value of $27. The carton was delivered to a freight forwarder who in turn delivered it to the railroad. The carton was never delivered to the consignee. The freight forwarder and the railroad will be described collectively as “ the carrier ”.

The contents of the carton were described by the plaintiff as “ notions ” and sent subject to that freight classification. The carrier maintains that the carton contained…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tanner v. WinfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API