Legal Opinion
State v. Gilmore
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided August 24, 2021No. S20G1430PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
312 Ga. 289
FINAL COPY S20G1430. THE STATE v. GILMORE. WARREN, Justice. The Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him[.]” U.S. Const. Amend. VI. In Crawford v. Washington,
541 U.S. 36, 68
( 124 SCt 1354, 158 LE2d 177) (2004), the United States Supreme Court held that the “admission of out-of-court statements that are testimonial in nature violates the Confrontation Clause unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- HENDERSON v. THE STATE (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- Leonard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- EFFICIENCY LODGE, INC. v. NEASONSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- Kingdom v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
- Johns v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.