Legal Opinion

R & R Steel Erectors v. Watson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 2002No. 01-1322PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I,YELVERTON, J.

R & R Steel Erectors appeals a judgment from the Office of Workers’ Compensation which refused to confirm a default judgment finding that Terry Watson violated Louisiana Revised Statute 23:1208. The judgment also dismissed all claims of R & R with prejudice. We reverse and render.

FACTS

Watson injured his lower back on December 6, 1999, while employed as a construction worker for R & R Steel Erectors (R & R). Watson and a co-worker were climbing two 12-foot ladders at the same time while carrying a 24-foot truss. The co-worker was climbing faster than Wat*1230son, which caused the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Thibodeaux v. BurtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. SimonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gorman v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Harrell v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Harrell v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Tina Crow, Individually and on Behalf of Her Husband, Isaac Crow, Jr. v. Bioscript Pharmacy, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2026
  5. Wright v. Cypress General ContractorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API