Legal Opinion

Arrington v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 20, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-1718Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DERREK E. ARRINGTON, Plaintiff. v. No. 24-cv-1718 (DLF) UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. ORDER Derrek Arrington, a prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks release from custody because the Bureau of Prisons miscalculated his good time credit. Compl. at 3, Dkt. 1. Before the Court is the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 15, and Arrington’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, Dkt. 17. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss and deny Arrington’s motion as moot. Under Federal Rule of Civil…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. Thomas, Oscar v. Principi, AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Joseph Arpaio v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API