Legal Opinion
Gibbs v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 1, 2011PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Respondent’s finding that petitioner failed to comply with the *413terms of a stipulation in which she agreed to permanently exclude her son who had engaged in criminal activity from her apartment, is supported by substantial evidence, including petitioner’s concession that the excluded individual was discovered in her apartment (see Matter of Folks v New York City Hous. Auth., 27 AD3d 270 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 709 [2006]; Matter of Romero v Martinez, 280 AD2d 58 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 721 [2001]). The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness, particularly in view of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Romero v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Wooten v. FinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Folks v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by12 opinions
- Matter of Lopez v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Pagan v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Romano v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Cruz v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cruz v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.