Legal Opinion
McKinnon v. Alpetco Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 1981No. 5546PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This controversy revolves around an amendment to a contract between the State of Alaska and the Alaska Petrochemical Company (“Alpetco”), 1 by which the state is selling 75,000 barrels a day of its royalty oil to Alpetco. McKinnon and Parker, who were legislators at the time the contract was amended, and the Alaska Public Interest Research Group (hereafter collectively referred to as McKinnon) brought an action in the superior court against Alpetco and the state. McKinnon alleged that various procedural errors occurred during the negotiation and approval of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Terminal Construction Corp. v. Atlantic County Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Jacob Adams v. Cyrus Vance, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Mickey Edwards, Member of Congress, Oklahoma v. James Earl Carter, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Libby v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kenai Lumber Co., Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Alaska Diversified Contractors, Inc. v. Lower Kuskokwim School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- ALASKA DIVERSIFIED CONTR. v. School Dist.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.