Legal Opinion
Bollinger v. Randall
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 12, 1957No. Appeal, 220PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
The folloAving excerpts from the opinion of Judge W. C. Si-ieely for the court below will reveal the facts and the legal problem involved on this appeal: “On January 22, 1950, the minor plaintiff, Barry William Bollinger, then iwo years old, was injured when struck by an automobile operated by the defendant. A settlement of all claims of the minor and of his parents arising from the accident Avas agreed upon by the defendant’s insurance carrier and Richard O. Bollinger, the boy’s father. The settlement contemplated the institution of an action in the Court of Common Pleas…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Stave Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Rebic v. Gulf Refining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Bekelja v. James E. Strates Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Seeley v. Citizens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Schwartz's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Portlight, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Gail Esther Frank, a Minor by Her Parents and Guardian, Shirley J. Frank v. Volkswagenwerk, A. G. Of West Germany v. Rosaria Ann Muckin and Donald P. Miller, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Dorenzo v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- North Penn Sanitation, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.