Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Hudson Transit Lines Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.), dated July 23, 1982, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The extreme penalty of striking a pleading for failure to comply with an order of disclosure is warranted only when the failure has been willful or contumacious (see, e.g.,Plainview Assoc, v Miconics Inds., 90 AD2d 825; Ortiz v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 72 AD2d 741; cf. Kamp v DHJ Inds., 75 AD2d 636). Inasmuch as plaintiff fully…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plainview Associates v. Miconics Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Unity Manufacturing Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Ortiz v. New York City HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Kamp v. DHJ Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph v. Roller Castle, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Stocker v. RuppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Irizarry v. Ashar Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API