Corman Realty, Inc. v. Rothstein
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
1. The defendants’ contention based on G. L. c. 160, §§ 88 and 114, in their appeal from a judgment entered on August 15, 1974, in the Superior Court was not raised in the pleadings or (for all that appears) otherwise brought to the attention of the trial judge, and we therefore do not consider it. See Foster v. Everett, 334 Mass. 14, 18 (1956); Henchey v. Cox, 348 Mass. 742, 747 (1965); Milton v. Civil Serv. Commn. 365 Mass. 368, 379 (1974). Nor do we subscribe to the defendants’ assertion that the judge insufficiently defined the geographical extent of the plaintiff’s easement, for we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Town of Milton v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- DeCanio v. School Committee of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Cassani v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
- Henchey v. CoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Ferris v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrammoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Outdoor Advertising Board v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Bird v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- IN THE MATTER OF 17 ALBION STREET TRUST.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Nayor v. PressmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982