Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Mahalingam
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 31, 1978No. 2168-3Published
1Opinion of the Court
21 Wn. App. 228 (1978)
584 P.2d 971
In the Matter of the Marriage of R. MAHALINGAM, Appellant, and ROSE MARIE MAHALINGAM, Respondent.
No. 2168-3.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
August 31, 1978.
David W. Henault and John B. Hancock, for appellant.
Howard Neil (William Buchanan and Marc S. Stern, Legal Interns) of Pullman Legal Aid Society, for respondent.
MUNSON, C.J.
Dr. R. Mahalingam, petitioner, appeals the child custody, support and attorney's fees provisions of a dissolution decree. We affirm.
The parties were married in 1967. In February of 1975, after a fairly tumultuous…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Loveless v. YantisWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re the Marriage of HadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.