Legal Opinion

Henriques v. Freisinger

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 3, 1933No. 4920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court entered upon the motion of the defendants for a nonsuit at the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony on the ground that there was no evidence to submit to the jury.

Some time between 11 and 12 o’clock on the morning of October 18, 1930, Arthur Simigilo, who was employed by Sigmund Freisinger, was driving a one-ton Ford truck with a closed body in a southerly direction along Seventh avenue approaching Twenty-Third street in the city of New York. The truck was fifteen to twenty feet long, for the body extended some little…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Suburban Electric Co. v. NugentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  2. Reading Co. v. Boyer.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  3. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. ThirouinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  4. Dobbyn v. Boat Repairing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  5. Lapp v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MaherDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. United States v. Julio AlbizuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API