Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Stricklin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1934No. 1529PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

J. H. Stricklin and wife, Annie Stricklin, executed and delivered to G. T. Blankenship a mineral deed conveying to him one-eighth of the oil, gas, and other minerals in a certain S5-acre tract of land owned by the grantors, and, as a part of the same transaction, said grantors executed and delivered to the Farmers’ Royalty Holding Company a mineral deed conveying to it three-eighths of the oil, gas, and other minerals in the same tract of land. Later said grantors filed two separate suits, one against Blankenship and the other against the Farmers’ Royalty Holding Company to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Russell v. Industrial Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wheelock v. CavittTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Davis v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Ward v. WeaverTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Bryant v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kimmell v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Blankenship v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Texas Osage Co-Operative Royalty Pool v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Rinehart v. TomerlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Gore v. Citizens State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API