Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1904No. 19,951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Blackford Circuit Court; JE. G. Vaughn, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Joshua Bailey for the violation of .§7510 Burns 1901. From a judgment entered on a verdict convicting defendant and assessing his fine at $35, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Section 7510 Burns 1901 (Acts 1893, p. 300, §1) reads as follows: “It shall he unlawful for any person, firm or corporation having possession or control of any natural gas or oil-well, whether as contractor, owner, lessee, agent or manager, to allow or permit the flow of gas or oil from any such well to escape into the open air, with*166out being confined within such well, or proper pipes, or other safe receptacle for a longer period than two days next after gas or oil shall have been struck in such well. , And thereafter all such gas or oil shall be safely and securely confined in such well,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Storms v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Russell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnston v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Tuolumne Cty.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lanigan v. Town of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Jarvis Drilling, Inc. v. Midwest Oil Producing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Board of Education v. Citizens' Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API