Legal Opinion

Pearsall v. Central Oil & Gas Co. of America

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1927No. 1387PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

Exceptions have been filed to the schedule of distribution reported by the master on behalf of D. B. Heiner,' collector of internal revenue, and by the Eranklin Trust Company. The exception of the collector is based upon the failure of the master to allow, in addition to the claim for taxes, the interest prescribed by statute upon failure to pay such taxes in due , time.

Ordinarily interest is not allowed upon claims against the funds of an insolvent in tifie- hands of a receiver. This rule is applicable when the fund is to be shared by general creditors, or by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. First Nat. Bank v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  3. Allentown National Bank v. Helios Dry Color & Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  2. Columbia Casualty Company v. Consolidated Shipping Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
  3. Sawyer Tanning Co. v. C. J. O'Keefe Shoe Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
  4. Thompson's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Montgomery County · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API