Legal Opinion

Howell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 6, 2004No. SC03-103PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

877 So.2d 697 (2004)

Paul Augustus HOWELL, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC03-103.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 6, 2004.

Rehearing Denied June 25, 2004.

Clyde M. Taylor, Jr., and Baya Harrison, III, Associate Counsel, Tallahassee, FL, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Charmaine M. Millsaps, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

Howell appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. Howell asserts that trial counsel was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Occhicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Darling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Dufour v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. Hitchcock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  5. Lukehart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API