Legal Opinion
Dade County v. Renedo
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 5, 1962No. 31928PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DREW, Justice.
On the initial examination of petition for certiorari, records and briefs in this case, we concluded that we had jurisdiction because of an apparent conflict between the decision of the district court below1 and the decisions of this Court in the Meyers v. City of Daytona Beach2 and Doty v. City of Jacksonville3 cases.
*314The questioned language in the opinion of the district court here under consideration is as follows:
“The jury, in considering and weighing the testimony of real estate experts, may consider experience and familiarity of such witnesses with locations affecting the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nielsen v. City of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Dade County v. BrighamSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Florida Power & Light Company v. McCollumSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Doty v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Meyers v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Behm v. DIVISION. OF ADMIN., STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Sun Charm Ranch, Inc. v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. DenmarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Solar Research Corporation v. ParkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Leeds v. City of HomesteadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.