Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
Appellant urges that the evidence did not authorize the verdict, and that the plaintiff failed to carry her burden of proving the negligence charged by a preponderance of the evidence. There is conflict in much of the testimony, and a verdict for the defendant railroad would have been authorized if the jury had viewed the evidence as requiring such a verdict from them in the performance of their duty. But the fact that the record may indicate that the evidence preponderated in favor of the losing party is not a sufficient basis, on appeal, to set the verdict aside. The trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. HarbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Cotton States Fertilizer Co. v. ChildsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Middleton v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- City of Cartersville v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railroad v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Delk v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Townsend v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Sanders v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Central of Georgia Railroad v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.