Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1969PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

This case is here to test the refusal of the trial court to suppress narcotic evidence seized in a hotel room occupied at the time by defendant. The question argued on appeal is entirely directed at the failure of the officers to conform to ORS 133.320. ①

This case is identical with State v. Hollman, 1968, 251 Or 416, 446 P2d 117, where we refused to consider on appeal an alleged violation of OES 133.320 because the issue was not presented to the trial court. In the instant case the statute was not called to the trial court’s attention, either by the motion to suppress or in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HollmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moreau v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. MarshOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Pavlik v. Albertson's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. SorgenfreiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API