Legal Opinion

Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Lockerd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1918No. 8 Div. 142PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County ; W. W. Haralson, Judge. Action by Tinie Lockerd against the Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen. Judgment for plaintiff by default, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Judgment by default in the suit of appellee against appellant was rendered September 6, 1917. The transcript does not disclose the date of defendant’s motion, but it does show that said motion was continued on September 22, 1917, and overruled March 23, 1918. The motion stated (1) facts going to show that defendant had a good defense, and (2) that defendant’s attorney, who resided at Montgomery, “while preparing to set up the defense of this defendant, was called to New York City on account of the serious illness of his daughter, and his time was taken up with caring for her and her removal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Elyton Land Co. v. Morgan & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Ex parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Brazel v. New South Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. Powell v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Gray v. HandySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atlas Auto Finance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Robinson Co. v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Gibson v. Farmers' Bank of LuverneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API