Legal Opinion

Croft v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1891PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Feom tlie Circuit Court of Etowab. Tried before the Hon. John B. Tally.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

The only exception reserved on the trial below goes to the refusal of the court to give the following charge requested by defendant:' “A reasonable doubt of defendant’s guilt is not the same as a probability of his innocence. A reasonable doubt of defendant’s guilt may exist when the evidence fails to convince the jury that there is a probability of defendant’s innocence.” There can be no doubt that the abstract proposition involved in this request is a sound one. Under the ruling in the case of Williams v. State, 52 Ala. 411, however, this charge would be condemned as being confusing, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Bain v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stokley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Whitaker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Bones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Clayton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API