Legal Opinion
State Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. Millville Improvement Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided July 7, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On bill to foreclose. On exceptions to master’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, V. C.
The mortgage being foreclosed in this case was made on August 31st, 1895, by the South Jersey Land and Transportation Company to Richard Ii. Rushton, conditioned for the payment of $26,000 January 1st, 1900, with interest at six per cent, per annum. There are no .special covenants or agreements in the mortgage. It simply pledges certain lands and premises in the counties of Atlantic and Cumberland in this state for the payment of the mortgage debt.
On August 19th, 1896, the mortgage was assigned by Mr. Rushton to the complainant, the State Mutual Building and Loan Association of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bailey v. InmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Bleyer v. VeederNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Barry, Inc. v. Baf, LimitedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Camden Trust Co. v. HandleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- E. Rutherford Sav. L. B. v. PacificoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942