Legal Opinion

Dumas v. Dumas

Virginia Circuit Court

Decided July 17, 2002No. Case No. (Chancery) 01-431Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge D. Arthur Kelsey

This matter comes before the Court on the Complainant’s request for a final divorce decree. After taking testimony by depositions, a Commissioner in Chancery filed a report stating that she “examined the Court file and determined that the parties are properly before this Court which has jurisdiction, proper service and notice having been obtained and given.” For the following reasons, the Court remands this matter back to the Commissioner for further review.

I. Under Virginia practice, a Chancellor should review de novo any legal conclusion reached by a commissioner.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. O'CONNELL v. BeanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. Cranford v. HubbardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
  4. Snyder Plaza Properties, Inc. v. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  5. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API